English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The damage generated by Hurricane Katrina caused significant private as well as social costs.  The water and force from the hurricane and subsequent flooding caused immediate property damage, but also potential environmental contamination over time.  The decision on the part of property owners affected by Katrina to deal with damaged property must take into account both the private and social costs.  This paper explores this decision making process using a real-options model.  In particular, we focus on the element of time preference in this decision.  We analyze the impact that changes in monetary policy, and ultimately the discount rate, have on the decision to repair or rebuild a property damaged by flooding.  According to the theory, rising interest rates would suggest a greater propensity to defer the option to rebuild damaged properties, whereas falling interest rates cause property owners to reach the decision to rebuild properties relatively more quickly.

Interest Rate Manipulation, Environmental Damage, and Loss Valuation