English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this book, Erica Beecher-Monas develops an interdisciplinary approach, combining legal and cross-disciplinary scientific considerations, to provide a heuristic framework within which to assess whether expert evidence meets the requirements of intellectual due process.  It provides a valuable introduction for lawyers to the methodological issues that need to be addressed in understanding whether a piece of proposed expert evidence can be classified as 'scientific.'  This book marks a welcome re-assertion, on firm epistemological grounds, that the use of expert evidence represents part of the rationalist endeavor of accurate fact determination, in support of the moral authority of law.

Book Review of Erica Beecher-Monas, Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process