English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

David Dominas article: Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiffs Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., Journal of Agricultural &amp; Food Industrial Organization: Vol. 2: No. 1, Article 8, is littered with rank speculation and baseless opinion, most of which can be dismissed without further comment.  However, Mr. Dominas characterization of the Courts post-trial rulingin which the Court entered judgment in favor of Tysonis a deliberate misstatement.  This Journals readers are entitled to an accurate report of the Courts disposition of the Pickett case, which I have provided in this Comment, and which can be verified by a review of the relevant court orders.

Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiff's Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. : Comment