English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper examines the desirability and constitutionality of using sampling techniques in conducting the United States census.  The census is one of the most controversial political events each decade.  Most people would be surprised to learn that the census was a hotly debated topic at the Constitutional Convention.  In spite of the fact that a census is typically considered more accurate than a sample, this paper argues that using sampling techniques, for the allocation of legislative seats, would produce a more accurate count of inhabitants in America.  Furthermore, the paper addresses the constitutional issues surrounding the use of sampling.

Publius and Proofiness: Is Using Sampling with the Census for Apportioning Representatives Constitutional?