English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The long-lasting race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Presidential nomination finished with Obama winning a clear majority of the pledged delegates.  Yet he did not win a majority of all votes cast, and indeed the popular vote total was extremely close.  This article assesses how a close vote total translated into a delegate victory for Obama.  Three factors are assessed: malapportionment in terms of delegates per state, a strong abstention (low turnout) effect in the caucuses, and the disqualification of the Florida results.  Numerically the abstention effect not just in the caucuses as a whole but across the various caucuses was the most significant factor.

the forum

How Barack Obama's Votes Beat Hillary Clinton's Votes in the 2008 Democratic Presidential Contest:  Not Malapportionment, But Turnout Variation and the Florida Effect