English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To demonstrate the importance of the circumstances of Article 59 of the Criminal Code (culpability, background, social conduct, personality, motives, circumstances and consequences of the crime, victim's behavior) for the effectiveness of the constitutional principle of individualization of the penalty, expressly foreseen in Article 5, XLVI of the Constitution. Based on the foundations of the theory of crime, it is sought to demonstrate that the relative indeterminacy in the combination of penalties, by conferring a certain scope of action to the magistrate, it contributes to the individualization of the penalty, but it will only be legitimated based on the motivation of judicial decisions. Methodology: The study adopts the method of approaching the bibliographic review, by reading books, scientific articles and legislation. Results: The individualization and application of the penalty, the criteria foreseen in article 59 of the Penal Code are at all times revisited by the magistrate, as a way of adapting the sanction to the practiced fact and particularizing its application to the offending agent and to the case concrete. Revista Jurídica vol. 02, n°. 59, Curitiba, 2020. pp. 499 521  Revista Jurídica Unicuritiba. Curitiba.V.02, n.59, p.499-521, Abril-Junho. 2020 [Received/Recebido: Dezembro 20, 2018; Accepted/Aceito: Novembro 12, 2019] Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Contributions: The importance of the Principle of Individualization, based on freedom, which has its amplitude as the system adopts relative indeterminacy in the combination of penalties, in the proportion in which it grants the judge a certain margin of performance. However, the reasonableness contained in this indeterminacy is essential to avoid arbitrariness. keywords: Individualization; penalty; judicial circumstances; judicial rationale.

A IMPORTÂNCIA DAS CIRCUNSTÂNCIAS JUDICIAIS PARA A EFETIVIDADE DO PRINCÍPIO CONSTITUCIONAL DA INDIVIDUALIZAÇÃO DA PENA