English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Unenforceable judgments are ineffective. However during the daytime, law operators are challenged to find ways to comply with court orders. In the case of the implementation of structural measures, this challenge is gigantic. The Democratic Constitutional process requires active participation of all those involved in the construction of the provision, because the effectiveness of the court decision, especially one that implements structural measures, is closely linked to reimbursement of all procedural subjects. It is argued, therefore, that the structural measure preliminary approval should be preceded by hearing the opposing party, to allow the delivery of effective decisions.

A Comparticipação como Pressuposto de Efetividade das Medidas Estruturantes Deferidas Liminarmente