English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Civil lawsuits relating air pollution health effects presented often times in Japan. As a evidence of causal relation between air pollution exposure and respiratory diseases, epidemiological studies were submitted to the courts. An interpretation of these studies by judges were markedly different and unique from ordinal epidemiological understanding; scientific understanding of the studies. Based on these unique implication of the evidence, the judgment announced forcefully recognizing a existence of causal relationship between exposure to pollution and disease outcome. The author wishes to let epidemiologists know the details of this phenomena, hoping a correct usage of epidemiology in the course of deciding judgment at civil lawsuit.

Problems in Implication of Epidemiology Submitted as Evidence to the Court of Air Pollution Health Damages Trials.