English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEl Inventario APO, creado para el contexto portugues, mide diferentes formas de congruencia entre valores personales y organizacionales. El presente estudio tiene por objetivo la validacion del mismo Inventario APO, para Ecuador. Se utilizo la version original de 19 preguntas y se aplico a una muestra de 133 trabajadores de varias organizaciones. A traves del AFE se redujeron a 18 items distribuidos en tres factores, explicando el 61,68% de la varianza con αgeneral=.758. Los valores de α para cada factor fueron: αajuste=.857, αconflicto=.855; y α reconocimiento=.855. Las diferencias en relacion con el Inventario portugues estuvieron en el numero de items final (Portugal=16 items, Ecuador=18 items) y al tipo de items removidos (Portugal=items 1, 5 y 19, Ecuador=item 2). Al igual que el estudio original los resultados muestran diferenciaciones conceptuales entre variables y resaltan la utilizacion de escalas independientes. EnglishThe APO Inventory was developed in Portugal, to measure different forms of person-organization value congruence. This study aims to validate the Inventory for the Ecuadorian context. For this, the inventory with 19 questions was used and it was applied to a sample of 133 workers from various organizations. Through factor analysis, items were reduced and were divided into three factors, explaining the 61.68% of the variance. Values for general internal consistency were α general=758, and for each factor were: αfit=.857, α conflict=855; and αrecognition=.855. The differences regarding the same study in Portugal were associated with the number of final items (Portugal=16 items, Ecuador=18 items) and the type of items removed (Portugal=items 1, 5 and 19; Ecuador=item 2). Like the original study, results show the conceptual distinction between variables measured and highlight the use of separate scale,

Estudio de Validación para el Contexto Ecuatoriano del Inventario APO Creado en Portugal