English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In order to clarify the functional differences between the 2 typical path patterns (I and III) in normal subjects, the masticatory efficiency and the function of the mandibular movement during gumi-jelly chewing were compared quantitatively between pattern I (20 subjects: smooth opening toward working side, and convex closing) and pattern III (20 subjects: opening toward working side after initially toward nonworking side, and convex closing). The results were as follows:1. For the amount of opening, no significant difference was found between the two patterns, though that of pattern I group was slightly larger.2. Pattern III group had a larger masticatory width than pattern I group, and a significant difference was found between the two groups.3. Pattern III group had a longer cycle time than pattern I group, and a significant difference was found between the two groups.4. Pattern I had a larger amount of glucose secretion than pattern III group, and a significant difference was found between the two groups.5. From the above, it was concluded that a functional difference was observed between the two patterns and that pattern I had a superior mandibular function and masticatory efficiency than pattern III.

Mandibular Movement and Masticatory Efficiency When Compared between the Two Most Representative Patterns of Masticatory Path.