English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The implant approach to the maxillary edentulous jaw comprises fixed prosthesis and removable prosthesis [removable implant overdenture (IOD)]. We held a debate on the choice of the prosthesis in clinical practice on the side of IOD. In the debate, it was important to preliminarily decide on the design that should be used, and therefore rigid and flexible IODs were discussed separately. Since various factors should be taken into account, the study was conducted in groups of items, i.e., anatomical aspects and preoperative conditions such as denture use before surgery, treatment costs, and life stage, especially in view of the necessity of nursing care. IOD was considered to be more appropriate than fixed prosthesis when taking the following conditions into account: if the horizontal ridge absorption in patients had progressed, when dentures familiar to patients had been used before implantation, when treatment costs would be reduced, or when patients’ nursing care needs would be expected. IODs seemed to fulfill implant prostheses’ requirements for patients with maxillary edentulous jaw in the aged society.

Comparison of fixed and removable implant dental prostheses for maxillary edentulous jaw