English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The  stand as the inescapable management unit is commonly defined for certain  characteristics such as cover type, ecological site type (or its components),  and proposed use. Examples thereof are given in this paper. Confusion arises,  however, when people use one characteristic, and then they themselves or  others assume that different or additional characteristics apply. This also  happens when the same land parcel is part of several stands because divergent  criteria are used, for example in a tropical environment, logging suitability  versus species composition. The stand must therefore be viewed as dynamic,  whereby change may occur in the temporal as well as in the spatial domain,  incorporating new, or integrating a series of previously competing management  objectives. Better resource management will also result when stands are  delineated according to inherent physical properties, intrinsic biological  potential, and current vegetation status (species, age, etc.). Some  difficulties preventing this at present are described.

The stand concept in today's forest resource management