English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case of Garcetti v. Ceballos eliminated First Amendment free speech rights of public employees when they speak or write as a part of their jobs. The decision jolted the academic community, as it was not clear whether the high Court intended for the Garcetti principle to apply to public university faculty who necessarily speak and write as an integral part of their duties to teach and publish. This paper analyzes the 2014 appellate case of Demers against Washington State University and discusses the free speech rights of public university faculty.

Anatomy of a Free Speech Lawsuit: Demers against Washington State University (2014)