English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this work is to asses theimportance of ultrasonic grade I echogenicity inpotential kidney donors in the absence of urinaryabnormality and with perfect renal function.Thirty four living related kidney donors with thisabnormality were included, age range between 23-48years. Ten matched healthy donors were studied ascontrols. All cases were thoroughly investigated includingmeasuring GFR by isotopic scan and estimation ofrenal reserve by dopamine and aminoacid infusion.Renal biopsy was done for 17 cases of theechogenicity group and 8 controls. Our resultsshowed that the renal reserve was comparable in bothgroups. Glomerular changes were found in 41% ofapparently normal donors and only one case ofcontrols. Conclusion: Grade I echogenicity may be sign ofunrecognised kidney disease. Renal biopsy ismandatory when such related donors are the onlyavailable.

Hyperechogenic renal parenchyma in potential live related kidney donors: Does it justify exclusion