English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the development of participatory approaches, evaluations of the participatory practices have been increasingly discussed due to the different conceptualizations of participation: whether it was a means to an end, or an end in itself. On the other hand, regardless of the conceptualizations of participation, there has been a tendency to evaluate participatory practices using pre-defined criteria of success. However, the present study argues that each participatory practice should be evaluated by all of its participants by developing a shared understanding and agreed-upon criteria of success, since such an evaluation process should take into account the uniqueness of each locality and each participatory practice, and the participation right of the individual in the evaluation process. As such, to reveal the requirements for the individual evaluation of each participatory experience, this study aims to explore the differences between the success definitions of different participant groups from contextually different settings in Turkey: Gazi (Samsun),

boğaziçi journal, review of social, economic and administrative sciences

Different Participant Groups, Different Success Definitions: An Exploratory Study in the Case of “Local Government and NGO Cooperation in a Participatory Democracy Project”