English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The literature has extensively documented the potential damage that work’s psychosocial risk factors have on the lives of workers. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact. Objective: To characterize the primary prevention interventions conducted and published on psychosocial risk factors inside the work environment (PRF). Methodology: This project had a quantitative approach of the type systematic review. Primary prevention publications were included, found in the EBSCO, PsycNET and SciELO databases, published in English, Spanish or Portuguese between January 2002 and December 2011, which documented the results obtained by the intervention. A checklist was used for classification of the published, selected and analyzed research documents, and they were recorded in a matrix designed for this purpose. In the different publications examines the intervention focus was identified, as well as the target population and the effects reported by each one. Results: Although 2925 items initially coincided with the search terms, after applying filters and review based on the criteria, only eight met inclusion rules. Conclusions: In the period under investigation, there were a few interventions inside the work environment (PRF) of primary prevention. Most items correlate the characteristics of the work or individuals with the consequences of the PRF, and the interventions used to happen at the secondary level and on the conditions of the workers. The selected papers presented interventions at the primary level where their effectiveness is limited by the difficulties in maintaining the proposed changes over time. The literature has extensively documented the potential damage of psychosocial risk factors work on the workers’ lives. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact. Received:  23/08/2016  Accepted:  26/01/2017 How to reference this article:  Cardona Rios, H. F., Londono Londono, M. E., & Vargas Betancur, M. L. (2015). Intervenciones para la prevencion primaria de factores de riesgo psicosocial intralaboral: revision sistematica de la literatura. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia Ocupacional, 34(2), 120-150. Doi: 10.21772/ripo.v34n2a05

Intervenciones para la prevención primaria de factores de riesgo psicosocial intralaboral: revisión sistemática de la literatura