English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The choice of therapeutic strategy for intracranial dissecting aneurysm is often based on radiographic features, including characteristic geometry (e.g., irregular stenosis, segmental stenosis, aneurysm formation [pearl-and-string sign]), irregular fusiform or aneurysmal dilation, double lumen, and tapering occlusion. However, there is often a discrepancy between preoperative radiographic data and actual dissecting length. The present report describes three cases in which there was a discrepancy between preoperative radiographic data and actual dissecting length in patients undergoing direct trapping with or without revascularization. All three cases experienced good outcomes, but these cases underscore the fact that open surgery is a good option for management of ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysms for determination of the rupture point, dissecting length, and the relationship between dissecting area and small arteries arising from the associated vessel.

neurologia medico-chirurgica

Discrepancy between Preoperative Imaging and Postoperative Pathological Finding of Ruptured Intracranial Dissecting Aneurysm, and Its Surgical Treatment: Case Report