English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study compared the difference between Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Courses) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) based on the contents and classifications of the courses, the course service structures, and the evaluation methods from the standpoint of learners through literature survey and comparison analysis. The study findings revealed that the Chinese University MOOC provides variety contents to students, schools, and also companies; the classification of K-MOOC courses is done according to level of difficulty and language. Also, both the Chinese MOOC and K-MOOC course service structures platforms have no quizzes and multi-language subtitles within the videos. Furthermore, the study findings revealed that the evaluation methods have no standards and have very different difficulty level to finish a course. Basing on study findings, there is a need for adding various contents to K-MOOC, classifying courses clearly in Chinese University MOOC, adding multi-language subtitles and quizzes in course videos to both platforms.

asia-pacific journal of convergent research interchange

Comparison Analysis of Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Course) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) from the Standpoint of Learners