English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

As one can see the two magnets have the same two coils: SC-01 and SC-02. The first coil used welded skins and was cycled and pre-stressed with the standard procedure while SC-02 used the skins as simple spacers (not welded). The purpose was to see if this procedure affects the training behavior of the coil in terms of quench performance comparing directly the two techniques. The main difference between the two magnets is the different pressure used in the final assembly (key insertion with different bladders pressure). SM01a was pressurized up to 13kPsi while SM01b was pressurized only up to 1.5kPsi so that the two coils were free to separate during current excitation. These two different assembly pressures showed an improved quench behavior in SM-01b, reaching a higher limit than in SM-01a.

SM01a and SM01b test results