English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article analyzes the right to consultation, guaranteed to indigenous peoples by ILO Convention 169, in its social, cultural, legal and political context. I draw on two case studies, one in Peru (the Rio Blanco case) and one in Guatemala (the Marlin mine case). Consultation has been an important element of both cases, but has played a different role in the two cases. Based on sixteen months of research in both countries, I argue that the right to consultation has been important for indigenous mobilization, primarily as a symbolic tool of legitimation, and less so as a legal mechanism.

La consulta a los pueblos indígenas y su evolución como herramienta de negociación política en América Latina. Los casos de Perú y Guatemala