English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the processes of ownership of rural property, different points of view have been presented for the determination of the legal nature of the litigious goods. On the one hand, the Supreme Court of Colombia has recourse to the legal presumption of private good when it is owned together with economic exploitation under the terms of Act 200 of 1936, and if the economic exploitation is kept, the good can be acquired by prescription. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court of Colombia considers as a sign of State-owned land the lack of registered owners and that the fact that the demand is directed against undetermined persons. After the analysis of these points of view, we support the Supreme Court’s position based on the structure and mandatory nature of the legal presumptions.

Posturas jurisprudenciales sobre la determinación de la naturaleza jurídica del bien rural en procesos de pertenencia