English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Gastric pull-up is the most commonly used procedure for esophageal replacement in both malignant and benign conditions. In our article we compare the differences in mortality and morbidity between thoracic anastomosis and cervical anastomosis during gastric pull-up. The study group comprised of 126 patients - 58 patients (56%) with cervical anastomosis and 68 patients (64%) with thoracic anastomosis. The overall mortality in the study group was 5.55% (7 patients), while the overall morbidity was higher at 28%. There were no significant differences between the two subgroups regarding mortality and morbidity, although the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in the cervical subgroup (13.8% vs 1.5%). We recommend performing thoracic anastomosis during gastric pull-up whenever the location of the lesion allows it, since the procedure is safe, relatively easy to master and it shortens operating time by excluding the cervical approach.

Comparative Study of Early Postoperative Complications: Thoracic Anastomosis vs Cervical Anastomosis - in Esophageal Replacement with Gastric Graft