English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Since the earliest beginning of history, architectu ral fortresses have acquired varied forms and masses. It was possible to interpret just ifications for using many of them; however, usage of some of these forms and masses is still considered as a perplexing mystery for scholars, analysts and interested perso ns in the topic of mass formulation in architecture. For example, the Giza Pyramids in Egypt which were built 4500 years ago, whose pyramidal mass, which was the output of several astronomic and mathematical relations in the pyramid form, the wor ld is still till our present day analyzing the inherent ideas beyond them. Throughout ages, ideas of approaching architectural masses differed till the architectura l masses of buildings at the end of the twentieth and the onset of the twenty-first centuri es reflected several matters. The most important among these are the architectural, constr uctive and mechanical sciences and the high technological reality. Thus, the architectural form has turned from static masses to dynamic masses during the digital and information revolution which concen trated on producing supplementary ideas and programs in design. In fact, design by th e help of computer programs achieves the uniqueness and distinctiveness of idea s, and the inventiveness of the mass and its transformations so that ideas of the archit ect are freed away from the traditional limitations and restrictions. With the development of computer technology with the digital, then the information, revolution, numerous generations appeared : the first was the computer technology (computer programs), the second was the digital (internet) and the third was the information (Infomedia). This development has had its direct effect on architecture and urbanization. Architectu re has had to correspond with modern needs for users; therefore, what was called digital architectural thinking or the third generation for creating architectural masses, and in turn the third generation of the contemporary urbanization texture, has emerged. Thi s represents the research problem in what we do not find in our local architecture du e to following the world in this technology because architects cannot identify it. H ence, it appears the importance of getting to identify what the architectural thought tools have reached and its passage through several generations so that it keeps update d with the age of technology and employs what technology provides of contribution in creating a building or a city that undergoes all kinds of tests before its implementat ion. All these ideas are interwoven is an architectural entity that contains them which re presents a digital reflection on the urban design controlled by information by what is c alled urbanization and architecture of the third generation of the age of technology in the twentieth-first century. Hence, the research is divided into several axes. To begin with, the first axis deals with the

The Effect of the Third Generation of the Digital Revolution on Developing the Formulation of Contemporary Architectural Forms