English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

SUMMARY cm, HR: 130.5 cm; CG: 201.9 cm, SBL: 149.1 cm. REA, P8 and weight of round were 96.2 cm 2 , 0.70 cm and 133.5 kg, respectively. Correlations between LW and the different body measurements were: HW: r= 0.57 (P<0.001), HR: r= 0.55 (P<0.01), CG: r= 0.60 (P<0.001), SBL: r= 0.18. A very close correlation was revealed between LW and weight of round (r= 0.93, P<0.001). Stepwise regression analysis (backward method) was used to examine how the weight of round (y) is affected by LA (x1), HW (x2), HR (x3), CG (x4), SBL (x5), REA (x6) and P8 (x7). In the 1 st of the 7 models all parameters existed as independent variables, multiple correlation coefficient (R) was 0.70 (P<0.10, rsxy= 11.65 kg). In the 4 th model, LA, HW, CG and REA remained as independent variables, resulting an R value similar to that of the 1 st model (R= 0.69, P<0.01, rsxy= 10.88 kg). The last model contained only CG (R= 0.62, P<0.001, rsxy= 11.11 kg). It was confirmed that the weight of round was determined in 38 % only by CG. It seems to be worth combining some body measurements with LA and ultrasound REA results for in vivo estimation of round weight of fattening bulls.

PREDICTABILITY OF ROUND WEIGHT BY SOME BODY MEASUREMENTS, AGE AND ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS IN AUBRAC AND CHAROLAIS FATTENING BULLS