English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Imaging techniques such as CT and MRI as well as bone scan interrogate are common methods used for evaluation of metastatic bone lesions. However, the sensitivity of skeletal scanning in diagnosing bone metastases is remarkably high, exceeding 90 %. Also, it is used most commonly based on its effectiveness, low cost, widespread availability and favourable dosimetry. On the other hand, the specificity is rather low, however the specificity rates have improved since the introduction of hybrid cameras that make it possible to combine physiological and anatomical information together (SPECT/CT) (1) . Also, the spatial resolution of bone scintigraphy is poor measuring approximately 1 cm and can result in difficulty determining the precise location of a lesion within a bone which can be of diagnostic significance (2) .

Comparison Between 99mTc-MDP and 18F-NaF is in Diagnosis in Bone Metastases.