English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: To compare transvaginal sonography for cervical length measurement and digital examination for Bishop score assessment in women undergoing labor induction at term. Patients and Methods: A prospective study involved 140 women subjected to induction of labor. Preinduction assessment of Modified Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length was done. Results: One hundred and forty nulliparous women had CL 7. Cervical length had superior sensitivity (83.74% vs. 65.4%) and marginally better positive (95.4% vs. 94.1%) and negative (37.5% vs. 21.8%) predictive values. Conclusions:Transvaginal sonography for cervical length measurement is better tolerated than digital examination for Modified Bishop score assessment.

SONOGRAPHIC CERVICAL CANAL LENGTH AND/ OR A BISHOP SCORE ASSESSMENT AS A PREDICTOR FOR SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION OF LABOR