English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of augmentation using mineralized plasmatic matrix versus autogenous bone graft on bone formation and implant stability. Methodology: Twenty Implants were inserted in the maxillary premolar and molar region after augmentation of 8 maxillary sinuses in 6 patients, divided into 2 groups, study group received MPM as a graft, while the control group received autogenous particulate bone. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding implant stability immediately after implant insertion; however, after 5-month stability in the study group was statistically significantly higher than the control group. The mean change in bone height after 4 months in the study group was statistically significantly higher than in the control group. Conclusion: The use of MPM in osseous regeneration and implant therapy has a positive impact on the outcome of the grafting surgery when used for open sinus lifting.

Posterior maxillary ridge augmentation with sinus lift using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix versus Autogenous Bone Graft