English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate Hyflex CM files and M-Pro files versus Protaper Next files regarding the amount of apically extruded debris in the mesial root canals of mandibular molars.Methodology: Sixty three human permanent mandibular molars were utilized in the study. Empty Eppendorf tubes were weighed using an analytical balance three times and an average weight was calculated (W1). Then, a hole was created in the stopper of the Eppendorf tubes and mesial roots were inserted. The roots were randomly assigned into 3 groups according to the instrumentation technique used: Group I: Protaper Next (n=21), Group II: Hyflex (n=21) and Group III: M-Pro (n=21). Distilled water was used as an irrigant in all groups. After instrumentation, the vials were placed in an incubator for 3 days and the apically extruded debris collected in the Eppendorf tubes were weighed again (W2) after instrumentation. Welch test was used for comparison between the three groups.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of debris extrusion of the three groups (P=0.204). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study it was concluded that all systems were associated with extrusion of debris.

Influence of different rotary systems on the amount of apically extruded debris in mandibular molars (An In vitro study)