English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of HI and CF tests for detecting antibody responses following naturally occurring influenza A and B infections. Methods: One hundred and twenty blood samples were drawn from one hundred patients with flue-like illness and twenty apparently healthy control subjects and tested at Central Health Laboratory in Baghdad/ Iraq using HI and CF tests for detecting three currently circulating influenza A and B strains during the period from the 1 st of January 2008 to the 1 st of June 2009. Results: 78-80% of the patients with flu-like illness responded to a t least one of three influenza virus antigens as measured by HI, while 34-35% of those patients showed a response by CF test. Conclusions: HI test has a higher sensitivity and lower specificity than CF test for detecting antibody responses from patients with influenza A and B viral infections.

Comparison between Haemagglutination Inhibition and Complement Fixation Tests in Detecting Antibodies Responses Following Influenza Viral Infection