English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Counter-implicature is utilized by some jurists as a method of legal inference and as a source of legislation. This paper analyses the perspective of a jurist affiliated to the Mālikī school of law and legal theory, namely al-Bāqillānī (d. 403/1013), regarding counterimplicature. It demonstrates that al-Bāqillānī does not conform to the predominant position of the school regarding counter-implicature. His affiliation to the Mālikī school does not prevent him from espousing a contrary view.

COUNTER-IMPLICATURE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AL-BĀQILLĀNĪ (D. 403 AH/1013 CE)