English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background and study aim: In patients suffering from portal hypertension as result of liver cirrhosis, hypersplenism was ranged from 11 to 55%. The aim of our work was to compare between percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and partial splenic artery embolization (PSE) in the management of hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis as regard efficacy and safety. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with splenomegaly and hypersplenism were divided randomly into three groups; Group (1): Twenty patients were underwent one session of MW ablation of splenic parenchyma with target ablation volume about 20%, Group (2): Twenty patients were underwent two sessions of MW ablation of splenic parenchyma with 1 week interval with target ablation up to 40%, Group (3): Twenty patients were underwent PSE. Results: There was an improvement in the hemoglobin, platelet and leucocyte levels in three groups, which was 9.47± 2.14 gm/dl, 42.75 ± 15.4 x103/ mm3 and 2.6±0.5 x103/mm3 before the procedure respectively and become 9.95 ± 2.29 gm/dl, 313.5±99.6 x103/mm3 and 6.88± 1.89 x103/mm3 after one month as regard PSE group. As regard one session of MWA was 9.73±2.02 gm/dl, 45.57±11.2 x103/mm3 and 2.8±0.85 x103/mm3 and become 11.83±0.74 gm/dl, 152±26.43 x103/mm3 and 5.85±1.01 x103/mm3 after one month. As regard two sessions of MWA group; was 9.2±2.15 gm/dl, 40.6± 11.5 x103/mm3 and 2.4±0.55 x103/mm3 and become 12.74±1.2 gm/dl, 183.4± 26.43 x103/mm3 and 6.29±1.17 x103/mm3 after one month. PSE was significantly more effective in the elevation of platelets and leucocytes than other two groups (p=0.00), and two sessions of MWA more than one session of MWA. The two sessions MWA group was significantly higher than other two groups while one session of MWA group was more than PSE group in the elevation of hemoglobin (p=0.00). No mortality occurred in the three groups, but PSE was associated with more serious complications than the other two groups. Conclusion: MWA and PSE were effective in treatment of hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis, while percutaneous MWA has less serious complications than PSE.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation versus Partial Splenic Embolization for Treatment of Hypersplenism in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis