English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the canal transportation, centering ratio, debris and smear layer score after using 3 rotary Ni-Ti systems, Revo-S (RS; Micro-Mega, Besancon Cedex, France) and ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and M-Pro system( Guangdong, China, Mainland). Material and methods: Thirty nine mesiobuccal root canals of extracted lower first molars with 20˚ to 45˚ angle of curvature and were divided randomly into 3 groups of 13 samples each: group RS, group M-Pro and group PTN. Root canal transportation and centering ratio were evaluated at 3, 6 and 9 mm from apex using i-CAT CBCT (Hatfield, pennsylvania ,USA) before and after preparation.Thirteen Roots from each group were split longitudinally using diamond disc, by making a groove on buccal and lingual side of root without reaching the lumen of the canal.The root halves were examined under Scan Electron Microscope (SEM) by magnification x 1000 and x 4000 for debris and smear layer respectively The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in canal transportation, canal centering ratio, debris and smear layer score between the three tested groups. Conclusion: From the obtained results and within the limitations of this study, the following could be concluded:M-Pro Nickel Titanium rotary system had a negligible effect on root canal transportation which was similar to the ProTaper Next and Revo-S systems and no system was able to clean the root canal system completely.

Comparative Assessment of the Shaping and Cleaning Abilities of M-Pro and Revo-S versus ProTaper Next Rotary Ni-Ti Systems: An In Vitro study