English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article considers the problem of the right to damages in public procurement law in the light of the broader indications of the legal tradition of European countries, and the fact that such a right is an important element of any system of accountability of public bodies. The topic has come to prominence following the two recent  Fosen-Linjen  judgments of the EFTA Court. In particular, the framing of conditions for public liability have prompted debate. The paper argues that in regard to the specific rules of the Remedies Directives, in analytical terms, and in terms of coherence with the status of the right to damages as a fundamental right,  Fosen-Linjen I ’s departure from the  sufficiently serious breach  condition is a more adequate understanding of the law.  Keywords: Public Procurement; Remedies; Liability for damages; Right to damages; ‘Sufficiently Serious Breach’ condition; EU law –  Fosen-Linjen  EFTA Court.

european procurement and public private partnership law review

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Damages in Public Procurement Law: A Right or a Privilege? Some Thoughts After the Fosen-Linjen Saga