English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The contribution explains the EEA law context of the  Fosen-Linjen  case, with a particular view to its EU law relevance. Its main finding is that the peculiarities of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) had no impact upon the EFTA Court’s interpretation of the Remedies Directive, so that the reasoning should be equally valid in an EU law context. It is also stressed, however, that the CJEU is under no legal obligation to follow the EFTA Court’s lead when the question of the threshold for contracting authorities’ liability for breaches of EU public procurement law comes before it anew.  Keywords: EEA Agreement; EFTA Court; Homogeneity; Judicial dialouge.

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ The Fosen-Linjen Saga from an EEA Law Perspective