English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This contribution delves into the discretionary power of national legislatures to implement additional or altered criteria in light of Article 12 of Directive 2014/24/EU (ie the institutionalised and non-institutionalised exemptions). Sparked by national implementations of this provision, it creates a stomping-ground for broader discussions on self-organisation within EU public procurement law. In light of the Lithuanian Case law that has been brought before the CJEU (Irgita Case, pending), it discusses what type of harmonisation was used for this provision, if these implementations are, thus, valid in light of EU law, and what this means for the influence of EU public procurement law on the organisation of public tasks on the Member State level.

Swimming Against the Tide The Harmonisation of Self-organisation through Article 12 Directive 2014/24/EU