English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case C-136/17 GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and Case C‑507/17 Google Inc v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), Judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 September 2019  Google is of course no stranger to the courtrooms at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Data protection laws are far from the only EU law subject-matter on which it acts (competition policy is a sector that springs to mind). In this case-note, we combine the review of the Court’s judgements in both C-136/17 GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and C-505/17 Google Inc v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL).  Article 16 TFEU – Articles 8, 9, 12 and 14 of the Data Protection Directive – Articles 9, 10 and 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation – Articles 7, 8 and 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU

european data protection law review

Google at the Kirchberg Dock. On Delisting Requests, and on the Territorial Reach of the EU’s GDPR (C-136/17 GC and Others v CNIL, C‑507/17 Google Inc v CNIL)