English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Big Brother Watch and Others v the United Kingdom, Application numbers 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 September 2018  A United Kingdom mass surveillance law, allowing for bulk interception by intelligence agencies and data sharing with foreign counterparts, violated both Article 8 and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that, inter alia, the lack of oversight of the entire selection process and the absence of any real safeguards applicable to the selection of related communications data for the examination constitute a violation of the right to privacy. Although the ECtHR did not find a violation of Article 8 in relation to intelligence data sharing, it is important that it acknowledged for the first time its  importance and stressed that the minimum requirements it has developed for gathering data also apply to sharing the data.  Article 8 ECHR; Sections 8 and 16 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA)

Big Brother Watch and Others v UK: Lessons from the Latest Strasbourg Ruling on Bulk Surveillance