English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case C-207/16 Ministerio Fiscal, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018  The Grand Chamber ruled that Article 15(1) of the e-Privacy Directive read in light of Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights must be interpreted as meaning that the access of public authorities to data for the purpose of identifying the owners of SIM cards activated with a stolen mobile telephone, such as the surnames, forenames and, if need be, addresses of the owners, entails interference with their fundamental rights, enshrined in those articles of the Charter. The Grand Chamber however ruled that such interference is not sufficiently serious to entail that access being limited, in the area of prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, to the objective of fighting serious crime.   Articles   83(1) and   267 TFEU, Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Articles 1(1), 1(2), 5(1) and 15(1) of e-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC   .  ‘Dick the Butcher:  The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers .’  William Shakespeare,  Henry The Sixth , Part II Act IV, scene II, Line 73

Ministerio Fiscal: Access of Public Authorities to Personal Data Retained by Providers of Electronic Communications Services