English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In light of confusion around how the  Google Spain  judgment, which affirmed a ‘right to be forgotten’, has been implemented, the present contribution uses a public international law approach in an attempt to clarify some implementation issues.  It considers aspects of the judgment and its implementation as having extraterritorial effect.  As such, principles of jurisdiction under public international law could provide guidance on how best to exercise the right to be forgotten.  The EU should exercise jurisdiction in a way that protects its citizens’ fundamental rights, preserves State sovereignty and is reasonable.

Google Spain Revisited: The Misunderstood Implementation of a Landmark Decision and How Public International Law Could Offer Guidance