English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case C-73/16  Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky, Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy,  Court of Justice of the European Union, OJ 2016/C 165/07, 10 February 2016 - Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 30 March 2017  Articles 7, 8, 47(2) and 52 (1)(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;  Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, 31);  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ 2016 L 119, 1).  While awaiting the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation, questions on effective remedies, legal grounds for processing, admissibility of evidence and the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights case law still occupy the CJEU.

The Right to Privacy with Respect to the Processing of Personal Data in the Context of Controlling Tax Fraud