English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case C-117/20 bpost, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022  The Court of Justice confirms that the non bis in idem principle, as guaranteed by Article 50 of the Charter, also applies in the event of a duplication of proceedings and penalties under sectoral rules and competition law. However, it is added that the application of this principle does not preclude a legal person from being fined for an infringement of competition law where, on the same facts, that person has already been the subject of a final decision following proceedings relating to an infringement of sectoral rules, provided that there are clear and precise rules making it possible to predict which acts or omissions are liable to be subject to a duplication of proceedings and penalties, and also to predict that there will be coordination between the competent authorities; that the two sets of proceedings have been conducted in a sufficiently coordinated manner within a proximate timeframe; and that the overall penalties imposed correspond to the seriousness of the offences committed.

The Duplication of Proceedings and Penalties under Sectoral Rules and Competition Law Recast: Toshiba Is Dead, Long Live Bpost? (C-117/20 bpost)