English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case C-724/17 Vataan Kaupunki v Skanska Industrial Solutions Oy, NCC Industry Oy and Asfaltmix Oy, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 14 March 2019  Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Compensation for the damage caused by a cartel— Determination of the undertakings liable to provide compensation — Succession of legal entities — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Economic continuity test  Case C-637/17 Cogeco Communications Inc. v Sport TV Portugal SA, Controlinveste-SGPS SA and NOS-SGPS SA, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28 March 2019  Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Directive 2014/104/EU — Article 9(1) — Article 10(2) to (4) — Articles 21 and 22 — Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the EU — Effects of national decisions — Limitation periods — Transposition — Temporal application

european competition and regulatory law review

Shining a Light on the Interface between EU and National Law in the Private Enforcement of the EU Competition Rules (C-724/17 Skanska and C-637/17 Cogeco)