English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Concerns for justice are widely considered in international climate negotiations as central to effective responses to climate change. However, there is debate as to what crucial notions of justice need to be reflected in a global climate change treaty. This study uses the Delphi method to identify the climate justice concepts that would be most appropriate for the global climate treaty from an Australian perspective. It is contended that the Delphi method, which allows future forecasting based on the consensus feedback of an expert panel, is the best technique to advance a defensible action plan to ensure climate justice.

Climate Justice for a Global Treaty: An Australian Perspective