English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Studies have shown that there were documented evidences of abnormal vital signs, without appropriate clinicians and nurses responses. We thus investigate the knowledge, and how nurses intend to respond to different combinations of vital signs values. Methods: This study was carried out in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso. Questionnaires were sent out to nurses to obtain relevant data regarding interpretation of vital sign values. Results: Eighty questionnaires were analysed. The mean age of the respondents was 36.4 (±5.27) years. Nineteen (23.75%) respondents got correctly the normal range for all the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Seven (8.75%) respondents knew that pulse rate is the earliest vital sign to change in most deteriorating patients. Fifty-nine (73.75%) respondents considered oxygen saturation as reliable indicator of respiratory functions. Most respondents (78.73%) would not consider oxygen support until saturation fall below 90%. Seventy-five (93.75%) respondents could not identify correctly patients at risk of deterioration based on different combinations of set of vital sign values, SpO2 and level of consciousness. Sixty-seven (83.75%) rated themselves to have good to excellent knowledge on vital signs and its interpretation, however, only 9 (11.25%) respondents have good comprehensive knowledge on interpretation of vital signs. Conclusion: Majority of the respondents could not interpret vital sign values correctly. We suggest need for continuous nursing education to bridge this gap.

A Cross Sectional Survey of Nurses’ Responses to Vital Sign Values in a University Teaching Hospital