English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

International Council for Harmonisation, Good Clinical Practice R2 (ICH GCP R2) focuses on quality management as per risk-based methodology, and there has been a lot of focus on monitoring strategy, which is a mixed method of on-site and centralised monitoring. This systematic review was planned to search for the articles providing the evidence for the impact of risk-based monitoring methodology and monitoring standards for cohort studies. A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE were as per the keyword’s searches. All the publications were reviewed for the data that provides evidence risk-based monitoring for randomised clinical trials and its impact to ensure that data integrity, patient safety, and results obtained were reliable. The search resulted in four articles that were qualified that discussed about the comparison between monitoring techniques and the risk-based monitoring methodology in randomised control trials and other interventional trials. Two publications suggested that the SDV% can be &lt;8% and range from 20-50%, respectively, depending on the assessed factors and risks. Although there is research being conducted to generate the evidence for risk-based monitoring and reduced SDV linked to data errors, further empirical quantitative research should happen to show the impact of risk-based methodology for clinical trials. There is a lack of systematic and empirical data for monitoring as part of quality management in cohort studies.

texila international journal of academic research

A Systematic Review to Observe the Impact of Risk-Based Monitoring as Compared to Conventional On-Site Monitoring in Randomised Clinical Trials and Quality Management in Large Cohort Studies