English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The countries of Western Europe and the US have a sufficient experience in solving problems related to the identification and management of systemically important financial institutions. In Ukraine, where the vector of the market economy development was taken only in the 2000s, all processes associated with the regulation and stabilization of the financial system are quite new. Since the biggest share of the financial market in Ukraine is occupied by the banking sector, the establishment of systemically important banking institutions should be a priority in forming stabilization measures of the country’s economy. This paper carries out an analysis of methods for determining systemically important bank as proposed by the National Bank of Ukraine, offering the author’s vision of a system of indicators of banks’ systemic importance. The authors have offered their own approach to determining a systemically important bank in Ukraine, which is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. During the second stage of the research a binary logit model was built, which helped to find a correlation between the activity of systemically important banks and the onset of economic crisis in Ukraine in 2008, 2009 and 2013.

Peculiarities of identification of systemically important banks and assessment of their impact of the occurrence of economic crisis