English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

An intercomparison study of ground-based Mie-scattering lidar systems was held at Gosan, Korea during ABC-EAREX 2005 in order to ensure the correctness and accuracy of the lidar retrieval algorithms as well as the aerosol extinction profiles. We compared the vertical profiles of the range-corrected raw lidar signals as well as the aerosol extinction coefficients determined from different types of Mie-scattering lidar systems. Three different aerosol loading cases were selected; in these cases, the mean deviations of the range-corrected raw lidar signals were estimated to be 4.5%, 8.0%, and 7.3%. An intercomparison of the instruments by an identical data-handling procedure (Fernald approach) demonstrated that the aerosol extinction profiles for the three selected cases were in agreement within a bias difference of 0.0051 km-1. The mean deviation of the signals for the aerosol layer between 0.6 and 3.0 km was 3.0%. The systems were intercompared for two lidar inversion algorithms by using simultaneous lidar measurement data sets as input; these input data sets showed agreement with their aerosol extinction profiles within a bias difference of 0.0086 km-1 and a mean deviation of 11.6%.

kisho shushi. dai1shu/kisho shushi. dai2shu/journal of the meteorological society of japan

Ground-Based Mie-Scattering Lidar Measurements of Aerosol Extinction Profiles during ABC-EAREX 2005: Comparisons of Instruments and Inversion Algorithms