English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A large number of studies have explored the diagnostic value of miR-210 as a potential diagnostic cancer biomarker to detect various cancers in patients. However, the results of its diagnostic accuracy and reliability in individual studies are still inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted this updated pooled analysis to derive a more reliable conclusion of the overall accuracy of miR-210 in cancer detection and diagnosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. The quality of all eligible studies was scored according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 guidelines. The bivariate mixed model was applied to pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic ORs. The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve and the hierarchical SROC models were used to check overall diagnostic performance. Thirty articles with 2,304 patients and 1,673 controls were included in this study. The pooled parameters calculated from all studies are as follows: sensitivity -0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79), specificity -0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83), positive likelihood ratio -3.57 (95% CI: 2.85-4.47), negative likelihood ratio -0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.40), diagnostic OR -10.98 (95% CI: 7.55-15.98), SROC -0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87). All of these results revealed that miR-210 had relatively moderate accuracy in distinguishing patients with various cancers from all other individuals. However, well-designed prospective studies with large sample sizes using different groups of the population are urgently warranted to confirm our findings.

Diagnostic significance of miR-210 as a potential tumor biomarker of human cancer detection: an updated pooled analysis of 30 articles