English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Different studies have shown that when a subject is asked to recall autobiographical memories, the affective valence of the recalled memories is congruent with the subject’s mood (for a review, see Blaney, 1986). For instance, Snyder and White (1982) observed that participants who were exposed to a positive mood induction tended to recall happy personal experiences (e.g., getting a good grade), whereas those exposed to a negative mood induction recalled fewer happy and more unpleasant personal experiences (e.g., break up of a romantic relationship). Usually, three main explanations have been offered to account for mood congruent recall of autobiographic memories (e.g., Drace & Desrichard, 2013). The associative network theory (Bower, 1981) posits that emotions form nodes that are organized into memory networks containing information that shares the same valence. For instance, Bower states that events learned in one psychic state can be remembered better when one is put back into the same state. Relying on classic network theories (e.g., Anderson, 1983) where it is posited that activation presumably spreads The effect of negative mood intensity on autobiographical recall: Evidence for the underlying role of affect in mood congruence effect