English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

State-of-the-art prosody modelling in content-to-speech (CTS) applications still uses the same methodology to predict intonation cues as text-to-speech (TTS) applications, namely the analysis of the generated surface sentences with respect to part of speech, syntactic dependency relations and word order. On the other side, several theoretical studies argue that morphology, syntax, and information (or communicative) structure that organizes a given content (semantic or deep-syntactic structure) with respect to the intention of the speaker show a strong correlation with intonation. However, little empirical work based on sufficiently large corpora has been carried out so far to buttress this argumentation. We present empirical evidence for the Information Structure–Prosody correlation using the Wall Street Journal Penn Treebank corpus recorded by native American English speakers. Our experiments reach a prosody prediction accuracy of 80% using the hierarchical information structure from the Meaning-Text Theory, compared to 59% of the baseline.

Using hierarchical information structure for prosody prediction in content-to-speech applications